4.7 Article

The interplay between membrane lipids and phospholipase A family members in grapevine resistance against Plasmopara viticola

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-32559-z

关键词

-

资金

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia, FCT/MCTES/PIDDAC, Portugal [PEst-OE/BIA/UI4046/2014, UID/MULTI/00612/2013, UID/MAR/04292/2013]
  2. Universidade de Lisboa
  3. [SFRH/BPD/115162/2016]
  4. [IF/00819/2015]
  5. [PD/BD/131030/2017]
  6. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PD/BD/131030/2017, PEst-OE/BIA/UI4046/2014] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Grapevine downy mildew, caused by the biotrophic oomycete Plasmopara viticola, is one of the most important diseases in modern viticulture. The search for sustainable disease control measure is of extreme importance, thus becoming imperative to fully characterize the mechanisms leading to an incompatible interaction. We have previously shown that lipid signalling events play an important role in grapevine's response to this pathogen, namely through changes in linolenic acid content, lipid peroxidation and jasmonic acid synthesis. Here, we have characterized the modulation of lipid metabolism in leaves from two V. vinifera cultivars (resistant and susceptible to P. viticola) in the first hours after pathogen inoculation. Prior to pathogen inoculation both genotypes present an inherently different fatty acid composition that is highly modulated in the resistant genotype after pathogen challenge. Such changes involve modulation of phospholipase A activity suggesting that the source of lipids mobilized upon pathogen infection are the chloroplast membranes. This work thus provides original evidence on the involvement of lipid signalling and phospholipases in grapevine immune responses to pathogen infection. The results are discussed considering the implications on the plant's physiological status and the use of discriminating lipid/fatty acids pattern in future selection procedures of cultivars.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据