4.7 Article

Assessment of Corneal Stromal Remodeling and Regeneration after Photorefractive Keratectomy

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-30372-2

关键词

-

资金

  1. NEI NIH HHS [R01 EY013322, P30 EY020799] Funding Source: Medline
  2. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Eye Institute (NEI) [EY013322] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study utilizes high resolution multi-dimensional imaging to identify temporal and spatial changes in cell/extracellular matrix (ECM) patterning mediating cell migration, fibrosis, remodeling and regeneration during wound healing. Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) was performed on rabbits. In some cases, 5([4,6-dichlorotriazin-2yl]-amino) fluorescein (DTAF) was applied immediately after surgery to differentiate native vs. cell-secreted collagen. Corneas were assessed 3-180 days postoperatively using in vivo confocal microscopy, and cell/ECM patterning was evaluated in situ using multiphoton and second harmonic generation (SHG) imaging. 7 days post-PRK, migrating fibroblasts below the ablation site were co-aligned with the stromal lamellae. At day 21, randomly patterned myofibroblasts developed on top of the ablation site; whereas cells underneath were elongated, co-aligned with collagen, and lacked stress fibers. Over time, fibrotic tissue was remodeled into more transparent stromal lamellae. By day 180, stromal thickness was almost completely restored. Stromal regrowth occurred primarily below the ablation interface, and was characterized by co-localization of gaps in DTAF labeling with elongated cells and SHG collagen signaling. Punctate F-actin labeling was detected along cells co-aligned with DTAF and non-DTAF labeled collagen, suggesting cell-ECM interactions. Overall, collagen lamellae appear to provide a template for fibroblast patterning during wound healing that mediates stromal repopulation, regeneration and remodeling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据