4.7 Article

Searching the second hit in patients with inherited retinal dystrophies and monoallelic variants in ABCA4, USH2A and CEP290 by whole-gene targeted sequencing

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-31511-5

关键词

-

资金

  1. Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII)
  2. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, Spain
  3. European Union (ERDF/ESF, Investing in your future) [PI15-01648]
  4. CIBERER ACCI [ER16P1AC702/2017]
  5. Regional Ministry of Economy, Innovation, Science and Employment of the Autonomous Government of Andalusia [CTS-1664]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Inherited Retinal Dystrophies are clinically and genetically heterogeneous disorders affecting the photoreceptors. Although NGS has shown to be helpful for the molecular diagnosis of these conditions, some cases remain unsolved. Among these, several individuals harboured monoallelic variants in a recessive gene, suggesting that a comprehensive screening could improve the overall diagnosis. In order to assess the contribution of non-coding variations in a cohort of 29 patients, 25 of them with monoallelic mutations, we performed targeted NGS. The design comprised the entire genomic sequence of three genes (USH2A, ABCA4 and CEP290), the coding exons of 76 genes and two disease associated intronic regions in OFD1 and PRPF31. As a result, likely causative mutations (8 novel) were identified in 17 probands (diagnostic rate: 58.62%), including two copy-number variations in USH2A (one deletion of exons 22-55 and one duplication of exons 46-47). Possibly damaging deep-intronic mutations were identified in one family, and another with a monoallelic variant harboured causal mutations in a different locus. In conclusion, due to the high prevalence of carriers of IRD mutations and the results obtained here, sequencing entire genes do not seem to be the approach of choice for detecting the second hit in IRD patients with monoallelic variants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据