4.7 Article

TNF-alpha increases the intrinsic excitability of cerebellar Purkinje cells through elevating glutamate release in Bergmann Glia

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-29786-9

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korean government (MSIP) [2012R1A5A2A44671346, NRF-2017M3C7A1029611, 2016R1D1A1A02937282]
  2. BK21-plus education program provided by the National Research Foundation of Korea [5262-20170100]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

For decades, the glial function has been highlighted not only as the 'structural glue', but also as an 'active participant' in neural circuits. Here, we suggest that tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha), a key inflammatory cytokine, alters the neural activity of the cerebellar Purkinje cells (PCs) by facilitating gliotransmission in the juvenile male rat cerebellum. A bath application of TNF-alpha (100 ng/ml) in acute cerebellar slices elevates spiking activity of PCs with no alterations in the regularity of PC firings. Interestingly, the effect of TNF-alpha on the intrinsic excitability of PCs was abolished under a condition in which the type1 TNF receptor (TNFR1) in Bergmann glia (BG) was genetically suppressed by viral delivery of an adeno-associated virus (AAV) containing TNFR1-shRNA. In addition, we measured the concentration of glutamate derived from dissociated cerebellar cortical astrocyte cultures treated with TNF-alpha and observed a progressive increase of glutamate in a time-dependent manner. We hypothesised that TNF-alpha-induced elevation of glutamate from BGs enveloping the synaptic cleft may directly activate metabotropic glutamate receptor1 (mGluR1). Pharmacological inhibition of mGluR1, indeed, prevented the TNF-alpha-mediated elevation of the intrinsic excitability in PCs. Taken together, our study reveals that TNF-alpha triggers glutamate release in BG, thereby increasing the intrinsic excitability of cerebellar PCs in a mGluR1-dependent manner.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据