4.7 Article

Phase Modulators Based on High Mobility Ambipolar ReSe2 Field-Effect Transistors

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-30969-7

关键词

-

资金

  1. Army Research Office through the MURI grant [W911NF-11-1-0362]
  2. NSF-HBCU-UP Institutional change through faculty advancement in instruction and mentoring-ICFAIM [HRD-1332444]
  3. Office Naval Research DURIP Grant [11997003]
  4. National Science Foundation [EFRI-1433311, ACI-1053575]
  5. Center for Computational Innovations (CCI) at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
  6. Extreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environment (XSEDE) [TG-DMR17008]
  7. NSF [DMR-1229217, NSF-DMR-1157490]
  8. State of Florida
  9. NIST/National Research Council Postdoctoral Research Associateship Program
  10. NIST-STRS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We fabricated ambipolar field-effect transistors (FETs) from multi-layered triclinic ReSe2, mechanically exfoliated onto a SiO2 layer grown on p-doped Si. In contrast to previous reports on thin layers (similar to 2 to 3 layers), we extract field-effect carrier mobilities in excess of 10(2) cm(2)/Vs at room temperature in crystals with nearly similar to 10 atomic layers. These thicker FETs also show nearly zero threshold gate voltage for conduction and high ON to OFF current ratios when compared to the FETs built from thinner layers. We also demonstrate that it is possible to utilize this ambipolarity to fabricate logical elements or digital synthesizers. For instance, we demonstrate that one can produce simple, gate-voltage tunable phase modulators with the ability to shift the phase of the input signal by either 90 degrees or nearly 180 degrees. Given that it is possible to engineer these same elements with improved architectures, for example on h-BN in order to decrease the threshold gate voltage and increase the carrier mobilities, it is possible to improve their characteristics in order to engineer ultra-thin layered logic elements based on ReSe2.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据