4.7 Article

Predictors of Liver Fat and Stiffness in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) - an 11-Year Prospective Study

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-14706-0

关键词

-

资金

  1. University of Helsinki
  2. Doctoral Programme in Clinical Research
  3. Diabetes Research Foundation
  4. Biomedicum Helsinki Foundation
  5. Orion Research Foundation
  6. Academy of Finland
  7. EU/EFPIA Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking (EMIF) [115372]
  8. EU project 'Elucidating Pathways of Steatohepatitis' (EPoS) [634413]
  9. Sigrid Juselius Foundation
  10. EVO from the Finnish government

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Liver fat can be non-invasively measured by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (H-1-MRS) and fibrosis estimated as stiffness using transient elastography (FibroScan). There are no longitudinal data on changes in liver fat in Europids or on predictors of liver stiffness using these methods. We determined liver fat (1H-MRS) and clinical characteristics including features of insulin resistance at baseline and after a median follow-up period of 11.3 (range 7.3-13.4) years in 97 Finnish subjects. Liver stiffness was measured at 11.3 years. Liver fat content decreased by 5% (p < 0.05) over time. Values at baseline and 11.3 years were closely interrelated (r = 0.81, p < 0.001). Baseline liver fat (OR 1.32; 95% CI: 1.15-1.50) and change in BMI (OR 1.67; 95% CI: 1.24-2.25) were independent predictors of liver fat at 11.3 years (AUROC 0.90; 95% CI: 0.83-0.96). Baseline liver fat (AUROC 0.84; 95% CI: 0.76-0.92) predicted liver fat at 11.3 years more accurately than routinely available parameters (AUROC 0.76; 95% CI: 0.65-0.86, p = 0.02). At 11.3 years, 29% of the subjects had increased liver stiffness. Baseline liver fat (OR 2.17; 95% CI: 1.05-4.46) was an independent predictor of increased liver stiffness. These data show that liver fat is more important than the associated metabolic abnormalities as the predictor of future liver fat and fibrosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据