4.7 Article

Eml1 loss impairs apical progenitor spindle length and soma shape in the developing cerebral cortex

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-15253-4

关键词

-

资金

  1. French Agence National de la Recherche [ANR-13-BSV4-0008-01]
  2. Inserm
  3. CNRS
  4. UPMC
  5. Fondation Bettencourt Schueller
  6. Federation pour la Recherche sur le cerveau (FRC)
  7. European Union [60253]
  8. JTC Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  9. ANR [NEURON8-Full-815-006 STEM-MCD]
  10. French Ministry of Research
  11. Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale
  12. Ecole des Neurosciences de Paris
  13. Company of Biologists
  14. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-13-BSV4-0008] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ventricular zone (VZ) of the developing cerebral cortex is a pseudostratified epithelium that contains progenitors undergoing precisely regulated divisions at its most apical side, the ventricular lining (VL). Mitotic perturbations can contribute to pathological mechanisms leading to cortical malformations. The HeCo mutant mouse exhibits subcortical band heterotopia (SBH), likely to be initiated by progenitor delamination from the VZ early during corticogenesis. The causes for this are however, currently unknown. Eml1, a microtubule (MT)-associated protein of the EMAP family, is impaired in these mice. We first show that MT dynamics are perturbed in mutant progenitor cells in vitro. These may influence interphase and mitotic MT mechanisms and indeed, centrosome and primary cilia were altered and spindles were found to be abnormally long in HeCo progenitors. Consistently, MT and spindle length regulators were identified in EML1 pulldowns from embryonic brain extracts. Finally, we found that mitotic cell shape is also abnormal in the mutant VZ. These previously unidentified VZ characteristics suggest altered cell constraints which may contribute to cell delamination.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据