4.6 Article

PD-1 and PD-L1 Expression in Renal Cell Carcinoma with Sarcomatoid Differentiation

期刊

CANCER IMMUNOLOGY RESEARCH
卷 3, 期 12, 页码 1303-1307

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-15-0150

关键词

-

资金

  1. Gloria A. and Thomas J. Dutson Jr, Kidney Research Endowment (Mayo Clinic)
  2. Center for Individualized Medicine (CIM)
  3. ASCO Young Investigator Award from the Kidney Cancer Association
  4. Action to Cure Kidney Cancer, a Kathryn H. and Roger Penske Career Development
  5. U.S. NIH [K12CA90628]
  6. American Association for Cancer Research
  7. Mayo Clinic Center for Individualized Medicine
  8. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), a component of the NIH [UL1 TR000135]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Monoclonal antibodies that target the programmed death-1 (PD-1)-programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) axis have antitumor activity against multiple cancers. The presence of sarcomatoid differentiation in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is associated with resistance to targeted therapy and poor responses to IL2 immunotherapy. Given the aggressive nature of RCC with sarcomatoid differentiation and the exclusion of sarcomatoid histology from metastatic RCC clinical trials, less is understood regarding selection of therapies. Here, we characterized the PD-1/PD-L1 axis in RCC with sarcomatoid differentiation. We directly compared two PD-L1 antibodies and found concordance of PD-L1 positivity in 89% of tested RCCs with sarcomatoid differentiation. Coexpression of PD-L1 on neoplastic cells and the presence of PD-1-positive tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes were identified in 50% (13 of 26) of RCCs with sarcomatoid differentiation. In contrast, only 1 of 29 clear cell RCCs (3%) had concurrent expression of PD-L1 and PD-1 (P = 0.002). Our study suggests that RCC with sarcomatoid differentiation may express PD-1/PD-L1 at a higher percentage than RCC without sarcomatoid differentiation, and patients with these tumors may be good candidates for treatment with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapies. (C)2015 AACR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据