4.7 Article

AKT-mTOR signaling modulates the dynamics of IRE1 RNAse activity by regulating ER-mitochondria contacts

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-16662-1

关键词

-

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/J017183/1]
  2. Cancer Research UK Programme Foundation Award [C37275/1A20146]
  3. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) project grant [SAF2014-51876-R]
  4. Worldwide Cancer Research Foundation project grant [15-0404]
  5. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO)
  6. Pro-CNIC Foundation
  7. Severo Ochoa Center of Excellence (MINECO award) [SEV-2015-0505]
  8. Worldwide Cancer Research [15-0404] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Inositol Requiring Enzyme-1 (IRE1) is the most conserved transducer of the Unfolded Protein Response (UPR), a surveillance mechanism that ensures homeostasis of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) in eukaryotes. IRE1 activation orchestrates adaptive responses, including lipid anabolism, metabolic reprogramming, increases in protein folding competency, and ER expansion/remodeling. However, we still know surprisingly little regarding the principles by which this ER transducer is deactivated upon ER stress clearance. Here we show that Protein Kinase B-mechanistic Target of Rapamycin (PKB/AKTmTOR) signaling controls the dynamics of IRE1 deactivation by regulating ER-mitochondria physical contacts and the autophosphorylation state of IRE1. AKT-mTOR-mediated attenuation of IRE1 activity is important for ER remodelling dynamics and cell survival in the face of recursive, transient ER stress. Our observations suggest that IRE1 attenuation is an integral component of anabolic programmes regulated by AKT-mTOR. We suggest that AKT-mTOR activity is part of a 'timing mechanism' to deactivate IRE1 immediately following engagement of the UPR, in order to limit prolonged IRE1 RNAse activity that could lead to damaging inflammation or apoptosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据