4.7 Article

Gasoline cars produce more carbonaceous particulate matter than modern filter-equipped diesel cars

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-03714-9

关键词

-

资金

  1. Federal Roads Office (FEDRO)
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) [200021 13016, 140590, PZ00P2_131673]
  3. French Environment and Energy Management Agency (ADEME) [1162C0002, 1262C0017]
  4. CARB [11-305]
  5. EPA STAR [83587701-0]
  6. Swiss Federal Office for the Environment (FOEN)
  7. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [PZ00P2_131673] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Carbonaceous particulate matter (PM), comprising black carbon (BC), primary organic aerosol (POA) and secondary organic aerosol (SOA, from atmospheric aging of precursors), is a highly toxic vehicle exhaust component. Therefore, understanding vehicle pollution requires knowledge of both primary emissions, and how these emissions age in the atmosphere. We provide a systematic examination of carbonaceous PM emissions and parameterisation of SOA formation from modern diesel and gasoline cars at different temperatures (22, -7 degrees C) during controlled laboratory experiments. Carbonaceous PM emission and SOA formation is markedly higher from gasoline than diesel particle filter (DPF) and catalyst-equipped diesel cars, more so at -7 degrees C, contrasting with nitrogen oxides (NOX). Higher SOA formation from gasoline cars and primary emission reductions for diesels implies gasoline cars will increasingly dominate vehicular total carbonaceous PM, though older non-DPF-equipped diesels will continue to dominate the primary fraction for some time. Supported by state-of-the-art source apportionment of ambient fossil fuel derived PM, our results show that whether gasoline or diesel cars are more polluting depends on the pollutant in question, i.e. that diesel cars are not necessarily worse polluters than gasoline cars.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据