4.7 Article

Vimentin knockout results in increased expression of subendothelial basement membrane components and carotid stiffness in mice

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-12024-z

关键词

-

资金

  1. Inserm
  2. CNRS
  3. Universite de Lorraine
  4. Nancy University Hospital
  5. Agence Nationale pour la Recherche [ANR-13-BSV1-0026-01]
  6. Region Lorraine
  7. Chinese Scholarship Council
  8. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-13-BSV1-0026] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Intermediate filaments are involved in stress-related cell mechanical properties and in plasticity via the regulation of focal adhesions (FAs) and the actomyosin network. We investigated whether vimentin regulates endothelial cells (ECs) and vascular smooth muscle cells (SMCs) and thereby influences vasomotor tone and arterial stiffness. Vimentin knockout mice (Vim(-/-)) exhibited increased expression of laminin, fibronectin, perlecan, collagen IV and VE-cadherin as well as von Willebrand factor deposition in the subendothelial basement membrane. Smooth muscle (SM) myosin heavy chain, alpha-SM actin and smoothelin were decreased in Vim(-/-) mice. Electron microscopy revealed a denser endothelial basement membrane and increased SM cell-matrix interactions. Integrin alpha(v), talin and vinculin present in FAs were increased in Vim(-/-) mice. Phosphorylated FA kinase and its targets Src and ERK1/2 were elevated in Vim(-/-) mice. Knockout of vimentin, but not of synemin, resulted in increased carotid stiffness and contractility and endothelial dysfunction, independently of blood pressure and the collagen/elastin ratio. The increase in arterial stiffness in Vim(-/-) mice likely involves vasomotor tone and endothelial basement membrane organization changes. At the tissue level, the results show the implication of FAs both in ECs and vascular SMCs in the role of vimentin in arterial stiffening.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据