4.7 Article

Plant organ evolution revealed by phylotranscriptomics in Arabidopsis thaliana

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-07866-6

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [0929262]
  2. Kansas Institutional Development Award (IDeA) Network of Biomedical Research Excellence (K-INBRE) Postdoc Award from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) [P20 GM103418]
  3. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences [0929262] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The evolution of phenotypes occurs through changes both in protein sequence and gene expression levels. Though much of plant morphological evolution can be explained by changes in gene expression, examining its evolution has challenges. To gain a new perspective on organ evolution in plants, we applied a phylotranscriptomics approach. We combined a phylostratigraphic approach with gene expression based on the strand-specific RNA-seq data from seedling, floral bud, and root of 19 Arabidopsis thaliana accessions to examine the age and sequence divergence of transcriptomes from these organs and how they adapted over time. Our results indicate that, among the sense and antisense transcriptomes of these organs, the sense transcriptomes of seedlings are the evolutionarily oldest across all accessions and are the most conserved in amino acid sequence for most accessions. In contrast, among the sense transcriptomes from these same organs, those from floral bud are evolutionarily youngest and least conserved in sequence for most accessions. Different organs have adaptive peaks at different stages in their evolutionary history; however, all three show a common adaptive signal from the Magnoliophyta to Brassicale stage. Our research highlights how phylotranscriptomic analyses can be used to trace organ evolution in the deep history of plant species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据