4.7 Article

A natural chalcone induces apoptosis in lung cancer cells: 3D-QSAR, docking and an in vivo/vitro assay

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-11369-9

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81473108, U1403102, 81302662, 81403094, 41306137]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province [2015020732]
  3. Research project for key laboratory of Liaoning Educational Committee [LZ2015067]
  4. Shenyang science and technology research project [F15-199-1-26]
  5. project of the State Key Laboratory for Chemistry and Molecular Engineering of Medicinal Resources [CMEMR2017-B03]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study was to study the antitumor effect of lonchocarpin (34) from traditional herbal medicine Pongamia pinnata (L.) Pierre and to reveal the underlying mechanism. The cytotoxic activities of lonchocarpin were evaluated in 10 lung cancer cell lines and it exhibited 97.5% activity at a dose of 100 mu M in the H292 cell line. A field-based quantitative structure-activity relationship (3D-QSAR) study of 37 flavonoids from P. pinnata was also performed, and the results obtained showed that the hydrophobic interaction could be the crucial factor for the antitumor activity of lonchocarpin. Molecular docking studies revealed that lonchocarpin bound stably to the BH3-binding groove of the Bcl-2 protein with hydrophobic interactions with ALA146. Also, lonchocarpin significantly reduced cell proliferation via modulating Bax/Caspase-9/Caspase-3 pathway. An apoptotic test using flow cytometry showed that lonchocarpin produced about 41.1% and 47.9% apoptosis after treatment for 24 h and 48 h, respectively. Moreover, lonchocarpin inhibited tumor growth in S180-bearing mice with an inhibition rate of 57.94, 63.40 and 72.51%, respectively at a dose of 25, 50 and 100 mg/kg. These results suggest that lonchocarpin is a potentially useful natural agent for cancer treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据