4.7 Article

Evaluating the Sources of Graphene's Resistivity Using Differential Conductance

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-10367-1

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Materials Sciences and Engineering [DE-FG02-04ER46180]
  2. Thailand Research Fund [TRG5880012]
  3. King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang Research Fund [TRG5880012, KREF015802]
  4. National Science Foundation [OISE0968405, ECCS-1509221]
  5. Directorate For Engineering
  6. Div Of Electrical, Commun & Cyber Sys [1509221] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We explore the contributions to the electrical resistance of monolayer and bilayer graphene, revealing transitions between different regimes of charge carrier scattering. In monolayer graphene at low densities, a nonmonotonic variation of the resistance is observed as a function of temperature. Such behaviour is consistent with the influence of scattering from screened Coulomb impurities. At higher densities, the resistance instead varies in a manner consistent with the influence of scattering from acoustic and optical phonons. The crossover from phonon-, to charged-impurity, limited conduction occurs once the concentration of gate-induced carriers is reduced below that of the residual carriers. In bilayer graphene, the resistance exhibits a monotonic decrease with increasing temperature for all densities, with the importance of short-range impurity scattering resulting in a universal density-independent ( scaled) conductivity at high densities. At lower densities, the conductivity deviates from this universal curve, pointing to the importance of thermal activation of carriers out of charge puddles. These various assignments, in both systems, are made possible by an approach of differential-conductance mapping, which allows us to suppress quantum corrections to reveal the underlying mechanisms governing the resistivity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据