4.7 Article

Compounding Impacts of Human-Induced Water Stress and Climate Change on Water Availability

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-06765-0

关键词

-

资金

  1. United States National Science Foundation [EAR-1316536, OISE-1243543]
  2. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory [DE-AC52-07Na27344]
  3. Prof. Stanley Grant
  4. Directorate For Geosciences
  5. Division Of Earth Sciences [1316536] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Office Of Internatl Science &Engineering
  7. Office Of The Director [1243543] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The terrestrial phase of the water cycle can be seriously impacted by water management and human water use behavior (e.g., reservoir operation, and irrigation withdrawals). Here we outline a method for assessing water availability in a changing climate, while explicitly considering anthropogenic water demand scenarios and water supply infrastructure designed to cope with climatic extremes. The framework brings a top-down and bottom-up approach to provide localized water assessment based on local water supply infrastructure and projected water demands. When our framework is applied to southeastern Australia we find that, for some combinations of climatic change and water demand, the region could experience water stress similar or worse than the epic Millennium Drought. We show considering only the influence of future climate on water supply, and neglecting future changes in water demand and water storage augmentation might lead to opposing perspectives on future water availability. While human water use can significantly exacerbate climate change impacts on water availability, if managed well, it allows societies to react and adapt to a changing climate. The methodology we present offers a unique avenue for linking climatic and hydrologic processes to water resource supply and demand management and other human interactions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据