4.7 Article

Combination therapy for tuberculosis treatment: pulmonary administration of ethionamide and booster co-loaded nanoparticles

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-05453-3

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Community [608407, 260901]
  2. Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR10- EQPX-04-01, ANR-14-CE08-0017, ANR-14-CE14-0027-01]
  3. Feder (Equipex Imaginex BioMed) [12001407 (D-AL]
  4. Region Nord Pas de Calais [12000080]
  5. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-14-CE14-0027] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tuberculosis (TB) is a leading infectious cause of death worldwide. The use of ethionamide (ETH), a main second line anti-TB drug, is hampered by its severe side effects. Recently discovered booster molecules strongly increase the ETH efficacy, opening new perspectives to improve the current clinical outcome of drug-resistant TB. To investigate the simultaneous delivery of ETH and its booster BDM41906 in the lungs, we co-encapsulated these compounds in biodegradable polymeric nanoparticles (NPs), overcoming the bottlenecks inherent to the strong tendency of ETH to crystallize and the limited water solubility of this Booster. The efficacy of the designed formulations was evaluated in TB infected macrophages using an automated confocal high-content screening platform, showing that the drugs maintained their activity after incorporation in NPs. Among tested formulations, green beta-cyclodextrin (pCD) based NPs displayed the best physico-chemical characteristics and were selected for in vivo studies. The NPs suspension, administered directly into mouse lungs using a Microsprayer (R), was proved to be well-tolerated and led to a 3-log decrease of the pulmonary mycobacterial load after 6 administrations as compared to untreated mice. This study paves the way for a future use of pCD NPs for the pulmonary delivery of the [ETH: Booster] pair in TB chemotherapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据