4.7 Article

Circulating miR-323-3p is a biomarker for cardiomyopathy and an indicator of phenotypic variability in Friedreich's ataxia patients

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-04996-9

关键词

-

资金

  1. FIS from ISCIII [PI12/02263, PI16/01031]
  2. European Regional Development Founds (ERDF)
  3. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad, Instituto de Salud Carlos III through CIBERer
  4. European Regional Development Funds (ERDF) at Fundacion INCLIVA
  5. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad [PT13/0010/0004]
  6. ACCI2014 (CIBERer-ISCIII)
  7. CIBERER's Biobank [PT13/0010/0064]
  8. Basque Biobank for Research-OEHUN
  9. Biobank for Biomedical Research and Public Health of the Valencian Community
  10. ISCIII
  11. FEDER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are noncoding RNAs that contribute to gene expression modulation by regulating important cellular pathways. In this study, we used small RNA sequencing to identify a series of circulating miRNAs in blood samples taken from Friedreich's ataxia patients. We were thus able to develop a miRNA biomarker signature to differentiate Friedreich's ataxia (FRDA) patients from healthy people. Most research on FDRA has focused on understanding the role of frataxin in the mitochondria, and a whole molecular view of pathological pathways underlying FRDA therefore remains to be elucidated. We found seven differentially expressed miRNAs, and we propose that these miRNAs represent key mechanisms in the modulation of several signalling pathways that regulate the physiopathology of FRDA. If this is the case, miRNAs can be used to characterize phenotypic variation in FRDA and stratify patients' risk of cardiomyopathy. In this study, we identify miR-323-3p as a candidate marker for phenotypic differentiation in FRDA patients suffering from cardiomyopathy. We propose the use of dynamic miRNAs as biomarkers for phenotypic characterization and prognosis of FRDA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据