4.7 Article

Astragaloside IV protects against podocyte injury via SERCA2-dependent ER stress reduction AMPKα-regulated autophagy induction in streptozotocin-induced diabetic nephropathy

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-07061-7

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81473480]
  2. Shanghai Municipal Health Bureau [ZYSNXD012-RC-ZXY, ZK2015A18]
  3. Innovation Program of Talent Project of Putuo District [2014-A-19]
  4. State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine of China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aberrant endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and autophagy are associated with diabetic nephropathy. Here we investigated the effect of astragaloside IV (AS-IV) on the progression of diabetic nephropathy (DN) and the underlying mechanism involving ER stress and autophagy in streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic mice and high glucose (HG)-incubated podocytes. The diabetic mice developed progressive albuminuria and glomerulosclerosis within 8 weeks, which were significantly ameliorated by AS-IV treatment in a dose-dependent manner. Moreover, diabetes or HG-induced podocyte apoptosis was markedly attenuated by AS-IV, paralleled by a marked remission in ER stress and a remarkable restoration in impaired autophagy, which were associated with a significant improvement in the expression of sarcoendoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ ATPase 2b (SERCA2b) and AMP-activated protein kinase alpha (AMPK alpha) phosphorylation, respectively. Knockdown of SERCA2 in podocytes induced ER stress and largely abolished the protective effect of AS-IV, but had no obvious effect on the expression of autophagy-associated proteins. On the other hand, blockade of either autophagy induction or AMPK alpha activation could also significantly mitigate AS-IV-induced beneficial effect. Collectively, these results suggest that AS-IV prevented the progression of DN, which is mediated at least in part by SERCA2-dependent ER stress attenuation and AMPK alpha-promoted autophagy induction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据