4.7 Article

Highly functional T-cell receptor repertoires are abundant in stem memory T cells and highly shared among individuals

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-03855-x

关键词

-

资金

  1. Program of the network-type Joint Usage/Research Center for Radiation Disaster Medical Science of Hiroshima University
  2. Nagasaki University
  3. Fukushima Medical University
  4. Cell Science Foundation
  5. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan [15K14879, 16K07175, 16K19576]
  6. Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) [16ek0510002h0003]
  7. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15K14879, 16K07175, 16H06499, 17H04219, 16K19576, 15H04308] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To expand our knowledge of the ontogeny of the T-cell receptor (TCR) repertoire of antigen-specific T-cell subsets, we combined next-generation deep sequencing and single-cell multiplex clonotype analysis to evaluate the diversity and frequency of paired TCRs, their functions and whether clonotypic TCRs are shared among different individuals. Using an HLA-A*02-restricted cytomegalovirus (CMV) pp65-derived immunogenic peptide, we found that the more dominant pp65-specific TCR clonotypes in the blood of healthy donors have higher binding affinities for the CMV peptide and arise from clonotypes that are highly shared among individuals. Interestingly, these highly shared HLA-A*02restricted CMV-specific TCRs were detected in a CMV-seronegative individual as well as in HLA-A*02negative donors albeit at lower frequency. More intriguingly, these shared TCR clonotypes were abundant in the stem memory T-cell subset, and TCR diversity of the stem memory T-cell repertoire was significantly lower than in the central memory and effector memory T-cell repertoires. These results suggest that the stem memory T-cell subset may serve as a reservoir of highly shared and highly functional memory T-cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据