4.7 Article

Two alternative pathways for docosahexaenoic acid (DHA, 22:6n-3) biosynthesis are widespread among teleost fish

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-04288-2

关键词

-

资金

  1. Commonwealth Scholarship Commission in the UK [NGCS-2014-438]
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  3. Major International Joint Research Project from National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [31110103913]
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16J06812] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) plays important physiological roles in vertebrates. Studies in rats and rainbow trout confirmed that DHA biosynthesis proceeds through the so-called Sprecher pathway, a biosynthetic process requiring a Delta 6 desaturation of 24::5n-3 to 24:6n-3. Alternatively, some teleosts possess fatty acyl desaturases 2 (Fads2) that enable them to biosynthesis DHA through a more direct route termed the Delta 4 pathway. In order to elucidate the prevalence of both pathways among teleosts, we investigated the Delta 6 ability towards C-24 substrates of Fads2 from fish with different evolutionary and ecological backgrounds. Subsequently, we retrieved public databases to identify Fads2 containing the YXXN domain responsible for the Delta 4 desaturase function, and consequently enabling these species to operate the Delta 4 pathway. We demonstrated that, with the exception of Delta 4 desaturases, fish Fads2 have the ability to operate as Delta 6 desaturases towards C-24 PUFA enabling them to synthesise DHA through the Sprecher pathway. Nevertheless, the Delta 4 pathway represents an alternative route in some teleosts and we identified the presence of putative Delta 4 Fads2 in a further 11 species and confirmed the function as Delta 4 desaturases of Fads2 from medaka and Nile tilapia. Our results demonstrated that two alternative pathways for DHA biosynthesis exist in teleosts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据