4.7 Article

Interplay between Alternative Splicing and Alternative Polyadenylation Defines the Expression Outcome of the Plant Unique OXIDATIVE TOLERANT-6 Gene

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-02215-z

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. NSF [IOS-154173]
  2. Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology [2016YFE0108800]
  3. Fujian 100 Talent Plan
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences
  5. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems [1541737] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pre-mRNA alternative splicing and alternative polyadenylation have been implicated to play important roles during eukaryotic gene expression. However, much remains unknown regarding the regulatory mechanisms and the interactions of these two processes in plants. Here we focus on an Arabidopsis gene OXT6 (Oxidative Tolerant-6) that has been demonstrated to encode two proteins through alternative splicing and alternative polyadenylation. Specifically, alternative polyadenylation at Intron-2 of OXT6 produces a transcript coding for AtCPSF30, an Arabidopsis ortholog of 30 kDa subunit of the Cleavage and Polyadenylation Specificity Factor. On the other hand, alternative splicing of Intron-2 generates a longer transcript encoding a protein named AtC30Y, a polypeptide including most part of AtCPSF30 and a YT521B domain. To investigate the expression outcome of OXT6 in plants, a set of mutations were constructed to alter the splicing and polyadenylation patterns of OXT6. Analysis of transgenic plants bearing these mutations by quantitative RT-PCR revealed a competition relationship between these two processes. Moreover, when both splice sites and poly(A) signals were mutated, polyadenylation became the preferred mode of OXT6 processing. These results demonstrate the interplay between alternative splicing and alternative polyadenylation, and it is their concerted actions that define a gene's expression outcome.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据