4.7 Article

Optical determination of Shockley-Read-Hall and interface recombination currents in hybrid perovskites

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/srep44629

关键词

-

资金

  1. Regione Autonoma della Sardegna through PO-FSE Sardegna
  2. Progetti di ricerca di base e orientata [CRP3-114, CRP-17571, CRP-18353, CRP-18013, CRP-24978]
  3. MIUR (Italian Ministry of University and Research) through Progetto di ricerca PON RC
  4. MAAT-Molecular NAnotechnology for HeAlth and EnvironmenT [PON02_00563_3316357]
  5. PRIN PERrovskite-based Solar cells: towards high Efficiency and lOngterm stability [20155LECAJ]
  6. Regione Autonoma della Sardegna [15]
  7. European Social Fund
  8. PON R&C MAAT-Molecular NAnotechnology [PON02_00563_3316357]
  9. Regione Puglia
  10. ARTI [LSBC6N4]
  11. HyLight [GOWMB21]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Metal-halide perovskite solar cells rival the best inorganic solar cells in power conversion efficiency, providing the outlook for efficient, cheap devices. In order for the technology to mature and approach the ideal Shockley-Queissier efficiency, experimental tools are needed to diagnose what processes limit performances, beyond simply measuring electrical characteristics often affected by parasitic effects and difficult to interpret. Here we study the microscopic origin of recombination currents causing photoconversion losses with an all-optical technique, measuring the electron-hole free energy as a function of the exciting light intensity. Our method allows assessing the ideality factor and breaks down the electron-hole recombination current into bulk defect and interface contributions, providing an estimate of the limit photoconversion efficiency, without any real charge current flowing through the device. We identify Shockley-Read-Hall recombination as the main decay process in insulated perovskite layers and quantify the additional performance degradation due to interface recombination in heterojunctions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据