4.7 Article

Genetic diversity, transmission dynamics and drug resistance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Angola

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/srep42814

关键词

-

资金

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (FCT) Portugal [PTDC/SAU-EPI/122400/2010]
  2. European Union
  3. FCT [PTDC/SAU-EPI/122400/2010, SFRH/BPD/95406/2013, SFRH/BPD/100688/2014, GHTM UID/Multi/04413/20139, SFRH/BD/73579/2010]
  4. European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases
  5. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/SAU-EPI/122400/2010, SFRH/BD/73579/2010, UID/Multi/04413/2013] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tuberculosis (TB) poses a serious public health problem in Angola. No surveillance data on drug resistance is available and nothing is known regarding the genetic diversity and population structure of circulating Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains. Here, we have genotyped and evaluated drug susceptibility of 89 Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates from Luanda. Thirty-three different spoligotype profiles corresponding to 24 different Shared International Types (SIT) and 9 orphan profiles were detected. SIT 20 (LAM1) was the most prevalent (n = 16, 18.2%) followed by SIT 42 (LAM9; n = 15, 17.1%). Overall, the M. tuberculosis population structure in this sample was dominated by LAM (64.8%) and T (33.0%) strains. Twenty-four-loci MIRU-VNTR analysis revealed that a total of 13 isolates were grouped in 5 distinct clusters. Drug susceptibility data showed that 22 (24.7%) of the 89 clinical isolates were resistant to one or more antibacillary drugs of which 4 (4.5%) were multidrug resistant. In conclusion, this study demonstrates a high predominance of LAM strains circulating in the Luanda setting and the presence of recent transmission events. The rate and the emergence dynamics of drug resistant TB found in this sample are significant and highlight the need of further studies specifically focused on MDR-TB transmission.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据