4.7 Article

Myotonic dystrophy type 1 patient-derived iPSCs for the investigation of CTG repeat instability

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/srep42522

关键词

-

资金

  1. Health and Labour Sciences Research Grants for Research on Rare and Intractable Diseases
  2. Intramural Research Grant for Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders of NCNP [24-9, 27-7]
  3. Program for Intractable Diseases Research utilizing Disease-specific iPS cells
  4. Core Center for iPS Cell Research, Research Center Network for Realization of Regenerative Medicine
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16H05321, 15K21113, 17K16711, 15J04853] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) is an autosomal-dominant multi-system disease caused by expanded CTG repeats in dystrophia myotonica protein kinase (DMPK). The expanded CTG repeats are unstable and can increase the length of the gene with age, which worsens the symptoms. In order to establish a human stem cell system suitable for the investigation of repeat instability, DM1 patient-derived iPSCs were generated and differentiated into three cell types commonly affected in DM1, namely cardiomyocytes, neurons and myocytes. Then we precisely analysed the CTG repeat lengths in these cells. Our DM1-iPSCs showed a gradual lengthening of CTG repeats with unchanged repeat distribution in all cell lines depending on the passage numbers of undifferentiated cells. However, the average CTG repeat length did not change significantly after differentiation into different somatic cell types. We also evaluated the chromatin accessibility in DM1-iPSCs using ATAC-seq. The chromatin status in DM1 cardiomyocytes was closed at the DMPK locus as well as at SIX5 and its promoter region, whereas it was open in control, suggesting that the epigenetic modifications may be related to the CTG repeat expansion in DM1. These findings may help clarify the role of repeat instability in the CTG repeat expansion in DM1.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据