4.7 Article

Nanoscale diffusion in the synaptic cleft and beyond measured with time-resolved fluorescence anisotropy imaging

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/srep42022

关键词

-

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust Principal Fellowship [101896]
  2. European Research Council Advanced Grant [323113-NETSIGNAL]
  3. Russian Science Foundation [15-14-30000]
  4. FP7 ITN [606950]
  5. Medical Research Council [22448]
  6. BBSRC [BB/J001473/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. MRC [G0801316, G0900613, G0600368, G0802216] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. Russian Science Foundation [15-14-30000] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation
  9. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/J001473/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  10. Medical Research Council [G0600368, G0801316, G0802216, G0900613] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neural activity relies on molecular diffusion within nanoscopic spaces outside and inside nerve cells, such as synaptic clefts or dendritic spines. Measuring diffusion on this small scale in situ has not hitherto been possible, yet this knowledge is critical for understanding the dynamics of molecular events and electric currents that shape physiological signals throughout the brain. Here we advance time-resolved fluorescence anisotropy imaging combined with two-photon excitation microscopy to map nanoscale diffusivity in ex vivo brain slices. We find that in the brain interstitial gaps small molecules move on average similar to 30% slower than in a free medium whereas inside neuronal dendrites this retardation is similar to 70%. In the synaptic cleft free nanodiffusion is decelerated by similar to 46%. These quantities provide previously unattainable basic constrains for the receptor actions of released neurotransmitters, the electrical conductance of the brain interstitial space and the limiting rate of molecular interactions or conformational changes in the synaptic microenvironment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据