4.7 Article

Identification of two p53 isoforms from Litopenaeus vannamei and their interaction with NF-κB to induce distinct immune response

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/srep45821

关键词

-

资金

  1. Guangdong Natural Science Funds for Distinguished Young Scholars [2016A030306041]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31402321]
  3. China Agriculture Research System [47]
  4. Guangdong fishing port construction and fishery industry development project [A201601A10]
  5. Guangdong aquatic improved breed system construction project [ZJ0003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

p53 is a transcription factor with capability of regulating diverse NF-kappa B dependent biological progresses such as inflammation and host defense, but the actual mechanism remains unrevealed. Herein, we firstly identified two novel alternatively spliced isoforms of p53 from Litopenaeus vannamei (Lv Delta Np53 and the full-length of p53, LvFLp53). We then established that the two p53 isoforms exerted opposite effects on regulating NF-kappa B induced antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) and white spot syndrome virus (WSSV) immediate-early (IE) genes expression, suggesting there could be a crosstalk between p53 and NF-kappa B pathways. Of note, both of the two p53 isoforms could interact directly with LvDorsal, a shrimp homolog of NF-kappa B. In addition, the activation of NF-kappa B mediated by LvDorsal was provoked by Lv.Np53 but suppressed by LvFLp53, and the increased NF-kappa B activity conferred by Lv Delta Np53 can be attenuated by LvFLp53. Furthermore, silencing of LvFLp53 in shrimp caused higher mortalities and virus loads under WSSV infection, whereas Lv Delta Np53-knockdown shrimps exhibited an opposed RNAi phenotype. Taken together, these findings present here provided some novel insight into different roles of shrimp p53 isoforms in immune response, and some information for us to understand the regulatory crosstalk between p53 pathway and NF-kappa B pathway in invertebrates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据