4.7 Article

Overlap Extension Barcoding for the Next Generation Sequencing and Genotyping of Plasmodium falciparum in Individual Patients in Western Kenya

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/srep41108

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health [UL1TR001117]
  2. Triangle Center for Evolutionary Medicine
  3. National Evolutionary Synthesis Center (NSF Grant) [EF-0905606]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Large-scale molecular epidemiologic studies of Plasmodium falciparum parasites have provided insights into parasite biology and transmission, can identify the spread of drug resistance, and are useful in assessing vaccine targets. The polyclonal nature infections in high transmission settings is problematic for traditional genotyping approaches. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) approaches to parasite genotyping allow sensitive detection of minority variants, disaggregation of complex parasite mixtures, and scalable processing of large samples sets. Therefore, we designed, validated, and applied to field parasites an approach that leverages sequencing of individually barcoded samples in a multiplex manner. We utilize variant barcodes, invariant linker sequences and modular template-specific primers to allow for the simultaneous generation of high-dimensional sequencing data of multiple gene targets. This modularity permits a cost-effective and reproducible way to query many genes at once. In mixtures of reference parasite genomes, we quantitatively detected unique haplotypes comprising as little as 2% of a polyclonal infection. We applied this genotyping approach to field-collected parasites collected in Western Kenya in order to simultaneously obtain parasites genotypes at three unlinked loci. In summary, we present a rapid, scalable, and flexible method for genotyping individual parasites that enables molecular epidemiologic studies of parasite evolution, population structure and transmission.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据