4.7 Article

Universal slip dynamics in metallic glasses and granular matter - linking frictional weakening with inertial effects

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 1-8

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/srep43376

关键词

-

资金

  1. NWO (Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek)
  2. NSF [DMR 1042734, DMS 1069224, DMR 1005209, CBET 1336634, PHY 1125915, PHY 1066293]
  3. National Science Foundation [DMR 1408686]
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  5. Division Of Materials Research [1408686] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Directorate For Engineering
  7. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [1336634] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Slowly strained solids deform via intermittent slips that exhibit a material-independent critical size distribution. Here, by comparing two disparate systems - granular materials and bulk metallic glasses - we show evidence that not only the statistics of slips but also their dynamics are remarkably similar, i.e. independent of the microscopic details of the material. By resolving and comparing the full time evolution of avalanches in bulk metallic glasses and granular materials, we uncover a regime of universal deformation dynamics. We experimentally verify the predicted universal scaling functions for the dynamics of individual avalanches in both systems, and show that both the slip statistics and dynamics are independent of the scale and details of the material structure and interactions, thus settling a long-standing debate as to whether or not the claim of universality includes only the slip statistics or also the slip dynamics. The results imply that the frictional weakening in granular materials and the interplay of damping, weakening and inertial effects in bulk metallic glasses have strikingly similar effects on the slip dynamics. These results are important for transferring experimental results across scales and material structures in a single theory of deformation dynamics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据