4.7 Article

Accessing the genomic information of unculturable oceanic picoeukaryotes by combining multiple single cells

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/srep41498

关键词

-

资金

  1. US NSF [DEB-1031049, OCE-821374]
  2. ANR French project Oceanomics [ANR-11-BTBR-0008]
  3. ANR French project France Genomique [ANR-10-INBS-09]
  4. ANR French project Prometheus [ANR-09-PCS-GENM_217]
  5. EU project SINGEK [H2020-MSCA-ITN-2015-675752]
  6. Spanish project MEFISTO [CTM2013-43767-P]
  7. Marie Curie Intra-European Fellowship [PIEF-GA-2012-331190]
  8. Juan de la Cierva [JCI-2010-06594]
  9. Ramon y Cajal fellowships [RYC-2013-12554]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pico-sized eukaryotes play key roles in the functioning of marine ecosystems, but we still have a limited knowledge on their ecology and evolution. The MAST-4 lineage is of particular interest, since it is widespread in surface oceans, presents ecotypic differentiation and has defied culturing efforts so far. Single cell genomics (SCG) are promising tools to retrieve genomic information from these uncultured organisms. However, SCG are based on whole genome amplification, which normally introduces amplification biases that limit the amount of genomic data retrieved from a single cell. Here, we increase the recovery of genomic information from two MAST-4 lineages by co-assembling short reads from multiple Single Amplified Genomes (SAGs) belonging to evolutionary closely related cells. We found that complementary genomic information is retrieved from different SAGs, generating co-assembly that features >74% of genome recovery, against about 20% when assembled individually. Even though this approach is not aimed at generating high-quality draft genomes, it allows accessing to the genomic information of microbes that would otherwise remain unreachable. Since most of the picoeukaryotes still remain uncultured, our work serves as a proof-of-concept that can be applied to other taxa in order to extract genomic data and address new ecological and evolutionary questions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据