4.7 Article

MiRNA-21 mediates the antiangiogenic activity of metformin through targeting PTEN and SMAD7 expression and PI3K/AKT pathway

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/srep43427

关键词

-

资金

  1. American Heart Association Scientist Development Grant [10SDG2570037]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China Grant [81172050, 81570263]
  3. Grant of Sichuan Province Science and Technology Agency Grant [2014FZ0104]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Department of Education of Sichuan Province of China [16ZA0178]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Metformin, an anti-diabetic drug commonly used for type 2 diabetes therapy, is associated with antiangiogenic effects in conditions beyond diabetes. miR-21 has been reported to be involved in the process of angiogenesis. However, the precise regulatory mechanisms by which the metformin-induced endothelial suppression and its effects on miR-21-dependent pathways are still unclear. Bioinformatic analysis and identification of miR-21 and its targets and their effects on metformin-induced antiangiogenic activity were assessed using luciferase assays, quantitative real-time PCR, western blots, scratch assays, CCK-8 assays and tubule formation assays. In this study, miR-21 was strikingly downregulated by metformin in a time-and dose-dependent manner. miR-21 directly targeted the 3'-UTR of PTEN and SMAD7, and negatively regulated their expression. Overexpression of miR-21 abrogated the metformin-mediated inhibition of endothelial cells proliferation, migration, tubule formation and the TGF-beta-induced AKT, SMAD-and ERK-dependent phosphorylations, and conversely, down-regulation of miR-21 aggravated metformin's action and revealed significant promotion effects. Our study broadens our understanding of the regulatory mechanism of miR-21 mediating metformin-induced anti-angiogenic effects, providing important implications regarding the design of novel miRNA-based therapeutic strategies against angiogenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据