4.7 Article

Pyk2 activates the NLRP3 inflammasome by directly phosphorylating ASC and contributes to inflammasome-dependent peritonitis

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/srep36214

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Taiwan [EMRPD1F0041, EMRPD1E1411]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [MOST 103-2320-B-715-001, MOST 104-2320-B-715-007, MOST 105-2628-B-715-002-MY3, NSC 101-2320-B-182-010-MY3, NSC 100-2320-B-182-020, MOST 105-2811-B-182-029]
  3. Mackay Medical College, Taiwan [1031A03, 1041B19]
  4. Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taiwan [MMH-MM-10404, MMH-MM-10502]
  5. Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan [CMRPD1D0101/102/103, CMRPD3E0071]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The inflammasome adaptor protein, ASC, contributes to both innate immune responses and inflammatory diseases via self-oligomerization, which leads to the activation of the protease, caspase-1. Here, we report that the cytosolic tyrosine kinases, FAK and Pyk2, are differentially involved in NLRP3 and AIM2 inflammasome activation. The inhibition of FAK and Pyk2 with RNA interference or chemical inhibitors dramatically abolished ASC oligomerization, caspase-1 activation, and IL-1 beta secretion in response to NLRP3 or AIM2 stimulation. Pyk2 is phosphorylated by the kinase Syk and relocalizes to the ASC specks upon NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Pyk2, but not FAK, could directly phosphorylate ASC at Tyr146, and only the phosphorylated ASC could participate in speck formation and trigger IL-1 beta secretion. Moreover, the clinical-trial-tested Pyk2/FAK dual inhibitor PF-562271 reduced monosodium urate-mediated peritonitis, a disease model used for studying the consequences of NLRP3 activation. Our results suggest that although Pyk2 and FAK are involved in inflammasome activation, only Pyk2 directly phosphorylates ASC and brings ASC into an oligomerization-competent state by allowing Tyr146 phosphorylation to participate ASC speck formation and subsequent NLRP3 inflammation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据