4.7 Article

The room temperature crystal structure of a bacterial phytochrome determined by serial femtosecond crystallography

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/srep35279

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Research Council
  2. Foundation of Strategic Research, Sweden
  3. National Science Foundation (NSF) MCB grant [1413360]
  4. Academy of Finland
  5. Finnish Cultural Foundation
  6. Foundation of International Cooperation in Research and Higher Education, Sweden (STINT)
  7. X-ray Free Electron Laser Priority Strategy Program (MEXT, Japan)
  8. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-AC02-76SF00515]
  9. NIH [P41GM103393]
  10. CFEL DESY through program-oriented funds of the Helmholtz Association
  11. Direct For Biological Sciences
  12. Div Of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience [1413360] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phytochromes are a family of photoreceptors that control light responses of plants, fungi and bacteria. A sequence of structural changes, which is not yet fully understood, leads to activation of an output domain. Time-resolved serial femtosecond crystallography (SFX) can potentially shine light on these conformational changes. Here we report the room temperature crystal structure of the chromophore-binding domains of the Deinococcus radiodurans phytochrome at 2.1 angstrom resolution. The structure was obtained by serial femtosecond X-ray crystallography from microcrystals at an X-ray free electron laser. We find overall good agreement compared to a crystal structure at 1.35 angstrom resolution derived from conventional crystallography at cryogenic temperatures, which we also report here. The thioether linkage between chromophore and protein is subject to positional ambiguity at the synchrotron, but is fully resolved with SFX. The study paves the way for time-resolved structural investigations of the phytochrome photocycle with time-resolved SFX.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据