4.7 Article

Prediction and evaluation of the lipase inhibitory activities of tea polyphenols with 3D-QSAR models

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/srep34387

关键词

-

资金

  1. Major Project for the Innovation of Industry and Research of Guangzhou City [201508020128]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81473115, 81402981, 81560661]
  3. Guangdong Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [S20120011316]
  4. Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou [2013J4501037]
  5. Medical Scientific Research Foundation of Guangdong Province [B2014228]
  6. Project of Guangdong Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine [20141064]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The extraordinary hypolipidemic effects of polyphenolic compounds from tea have been confirmed in our previous study. To gain compounds with more potent activities, using the conformations of the most active compound revealed by molecular docking, a 3D-QSAR pancreatic lipase inhibitor model with good predictive ability was established and validated by CoMFA and CoMISA methods. With good statistical significance in CoMFA (r(cv)(2) = 0.622, r(2) = 0.956, F = 261.463, SEE = 0.096) and CoMISA (r(cv)(2) = 0.631, r(2) = 0.932, F = 75.408, SEE = 0.212) model, we summarized the structure-activity relationship between polyphenolic compounds and pancreatic lipase inhibitory activities and find the bulky substituents in R-2, R-4 and R-5, hydrophilic substituents in R-1 and electron withdrawing groups in R-2 are the key factors to enhance the lipase inhibitory activities. Under the guidance of the 3D-QSAR results, (2R, 3R, 2'R, 3'R)-desgalloyloolongtheanin-3,3'-O-digallate (DOTD), a potent lipase inhibitor with an IC50 of 0.08 mu g/ml, was obtained from EGCG oxidative polymerization catalyzed by crude polyphenol oxidase. Furthermore, DOTD was found to inhibit lipid absorption in olive oil-loaded rats, which was related with inhibiting the activities of lipase in the intestinal mucosa and contents.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据