4.7 Article

A Novel Genetic Variant in Long Non-coding RNA Gene NEXN-AS1 is Associated with Risk of Lung Cancer

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/srep34234

关键词

-

资金

  1. Transdisciplinary Research in Cancer of the Lung (TRICL) Study on behalf of the Genetic Associations and Mechanisms in Oncology (GAME-ON) Network [U19-CA148127]
  2. Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute [020214]
  3. Ontario Institute of Cancer
  4. Cancer Care Ontario Chair Award
  5. Cancer Research UK [C1298/A8780, C1298/A8362]
  6. NCRN
  7. HEAL
  8. Sanofi-Aventis
  9. NIH [5R01CA055769, 5R01CA127219, 5R01CA133996, 5R01CA121197, U19CA148127, P50 CA70907, R01CA121197, R01CA127219, U19 CA148127, R01 CA55769, K07CA160753, HHSN268200782096C]
  10. Roy Castle Lung Cancer Foundation, UK
  11. Deutsche Krebshilfe [70-2919]
  12. Helmholtz-DAAD fellowship [A/07/97379]
  13. GSF - German Federal Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Technology
  14. State of Bavaria
  15. National Genome Research Network (NGFN)
  16. DFG [BI576/2-1, BI 576/2-2]
  17. Helmholtzgemeinschaft (HGF)
  18. Federal office for Radiation Protection [BfS: STSch4454]
  19. Institut National du Cancer, France
  20. European Community [LSHG-CT-2005-512113]
  21. Norwegian Cancer Association
  22. Functional Genomics Programme of Research Council of Norway
  23. European Regional Development Fund
  24. State Budget of the Czech Republic (RECAMO) [CZ.1.05/2.1.00/03.0101]
  25. US National Cancer Institute, NIH [R01 CA111703, UO1 CA63673]
  26. Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
  27. US National Cancer Institute [R01 CA092039]
  28. FP7 grant [REGPOT245536]
  29. Estonian Government [SF0180142s08]
  30. EU RDF in the frame of Centre of Excellence in Genomics
  31. Estoinian Research Infrastructure's Roadmap
  32. University of Tartu [SP1GVARENG]
  33. IARC
  34. Intramural Research Program of NIH, NCI, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics
  35. US Public Health Service from the NCI [N01-CN-45165, N01-RC-45035, N01-RC-37004]
  36. NCI [NO1-CN-25514, NO1-CN-25522, NO1-CN-25515, NO1-CN-25512, NO1-CN-25513, NO1-CN-25516, NO1-CN-25511, NO1-CN-25524, NO1-CN-25518, NO1-CN-75022, NO1-CN-25476, NO1-CN-25404]
  37. American Cancer Society
  38. NIH Genes, Environment and Health Initiative (GEI) [HG-06-033-NCI-01, RO1HL091172-01, U01HG004438, NIH HHSN268200782096C, U01 HG004446]
  39. CPRIT grant [RP100443]
  40. NIH (National Cancer Institute) [CA092824, CA090578, CA074386]
  41. GENADDICT [LSHMCT-2004-005166]
  42. National Institutes of Health [R01-DA017932]
  43. Duke Cancer Institute as part of the P30 Cancer Center Support Grant [NIH CA014236]
  44. Duke Cancer Institute
  45. Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center
  46. Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Personalized Medicine, Nanjing Medical University
  47. LUNGevity Foundation
  48. [U01 HG007033]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lung cancer etiology is multifactorial, and growing evidence has indicated that long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are important players in lung carcinogenesis. We performed a large-scale meta-analysis of 690,564 SNPs in 15,531 autosomal lncRNAs by using datasets from six previously published genome-wide association studies (GWASs) from the Transdisciplinary Research in Cancer of the Lung (TRICL) consortium in populations of European ancestry. Previously unreported significant SNPs (P value < 1 x 10(-7)) were further validated in two additional independent lung cancer GWAS datasets from Harvard University and deCODE. In the final meta-analysis of all eight GWAS datasets with 17,153 cases and 239,337 controls, a novel risk SNP rs114020893 in the lncRNA NEXN-AS1 region at 1p31.1 remained statistically significant (odds ratio = 1.17; 95% confidence interval = 1.11-1.24; P = 8.31 x 10(-9)). In further in silico analysis, rs114020893 was predicted to change the secondary structure of the lncRNA. Our finding indicates that SNP rs114020893 of NEXN-AS1 at 1p31.1 may contribute to lung cancer susceptibility.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据