4.7 Article

Refined purification strategy for reliable proteomic profiling of HDL2/3: Impact on proteomic complexity

期刊

Scientific Reports
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/srep38533

关键词

-

资金

  1. Austrian National Bank [15883]
  2. Austrian Science Fund FWF [P22521-B18, P22976-B18]
  3. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P 22976] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P22976] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Proteomics have extended the list of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) associated proteins to about 90. One of the major issues of global protein characterization is establishing specificity of association as opposed to contamination, a fact which has never been addressed for isolated HDL. We have developed a refined purification strategy to isolate HDL by density, followed by purification by size to generate highly purified fractions of HDL2/3, which allow the reliable quantification of the HDL proteome for biomarker discovery. Mass spectrometry analysis revealed that the proteome of HDL2/3 is composed of 10-16 different proteins, which is in striking contrast to previous reports. Importantly, proteomic analysis revealed that many proteins which have recently been described to be associated with HDL, including alpha-1-antitrypsin, alpha-2-HS-glycoprotein, serotransferrin, apolipoprotein A-IV and others, are not associated with HDL2/3 and are exclusively found in a different molecular weight fraction containing human serum albumin, lipid-poor apolipoprotein A-I and other proteins. Interestingly, proteins found in this lower molecular weight fraction commonly share lipid-binding properties and enrichment of serum with free fatty acids/lysophophatidylcholine led to a significant increase in co-isolation of lipid-binding proteins such as albumin and alpha-1-antitrypsin. We propose that this refined method might become a standard in proteomic assessment of HDL2/3 making data from clinical cohorts more comparable and reproducible.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据