4.7 Article

The genetics of an early Neolithic pastoralist from the Zagros, Iran

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/srep31326

关键词

-

资金

  1. ERC [647787, ERC-2010-StG 26344, 310763, 617627]
  2. Irish Research Council for Humanities and Social Sciences (IRCHSS) ERC Support Programme
  3. Marie-Curie Intra-European Fellowships [FP7-IEF-328024]
  4. Ulsan National Institute of Science & Technology (UNIST) [1.140077.01]
  5. Geromics
  6. Civil-Military Technology Cooperation Program [14-BR-SS-03]
  7. BBSRC
  8. European Research Council (ERC) [647787, 310763, 617627] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)
  9. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [1344400] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The agricultural transition profoundly changed human societies. We sequenced and analysed the first genome (1.39x) of an early Neolithic woman from Ganj Dareh, in the Zagros Mountains of Iran, a site with early evidence for an economy based on goat herding, ca. 10,000 BP. We show that Western Iran was inhabited by a population genetically most similar to hunter-gatherers from the Caucasus, but distinct from the Neolithic Anatolian people who later brought food production into Europe. The inhabitants of Ganj Dareh made little direct genetic contribution to modern European populations, suggesting those of the Central Zagros were somewhat isolated from other populations of the Fertile Crescent. Runs of homozygosity are of a similar length to those from Neolithic farmers, and shorter than those of Caucasus and Western Hunter-Gatherers, suggesting that the inhabitants of Ganj Dareh did not undergo the large population bottleneck suffered by their northern neighbours. While some degree of cultural diffusion between Anatolia, Western Iran and other neighbouring regions is possible, the genetic dissimilarity between early Anatolian farmers and the inhabitants of Ganj Dareh supports a model in which Neolithic societies in these areas were distinct.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据