4.7 Article

Genome-scale DNA variant analysis and functional validation of a SNP underlying yellow fruit color in wild strawberry

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/srep29017

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF [0923913, 1444987]
  2. Maryland MAES Hatch Project [MD-CBMG-0738]
  3. University of Maryland CBMG Postdoctoral Merit Fellowship
  4. MOCB-CA Summer Fellowship
  5. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems
  6. Direct For Biological Sciences [1444987] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems
  8. Direct For Biological Sciences [0923913] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fragaria vesca is a species of diploid strawberry being developed as a model for the octoploid garden strawberry. This work sequenced and compared the genomes of three F. vesca accessions: 'Hawaii 4', 'Rugen', and 'Yellow Wonder'. Genome-scale analyses of shared and distinct SNPs among these three accessions have revealed that 'Rugen' and 'Yellow Wonder' are more similar to each other than they are to 'Hawaii 4'. Though all three accessions are inbred seven generations, each accession still possesses extensive heterozygosity, highlighting the inherent differences between individual plants even of the same accession. The identification of the impact of each SNP as well as the large number of Indel markers provides a foundation for locating candidate mutations underlying phenotypic variations among these F. vesca accessions and for mapping new mutations generated through forward genetics screens. Through systematic analysis of SNP variants affecting genes in anthocyanin biosynthesis and regulation, a candidate SNP in FveMYB10 was identified and then functionally confirmed to be responsible for the yellow color fruits made by many F. vesca accessions. As a whole, this study provides further resources for F. vesca and establishes a foundation for linking traits of economic importance to specific genes and variants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据