4.7 Article

Excitation of dark multipolar plasmonic resonances at terahertz frequencies

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/srep22027

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Program of Key Basic Research Project of China (973 Program) [2014CB339806]
  2. Major National Development Project of Scientific Instrument and Equipment [2011YQ150021, 2012YQ14000504]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61138001, 61205094, 61307126, 61377111]
  4. Shanghai Rising-Star Program [14QA1403100]
  5. Program of Shanghai Subject Chief Scientist [14XD1403000]
  6. Hujiang Foundation of China [C14002]
  7. Zhejiang Key Discipline of Instrument Science and Technology [JL150505]
  8. China Scholarship Council Fund [201508310049]
  9. New Century Excellent Talents Project from Ministry of Education [NCET-12-1052]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We experimentally observe the excitation of dark multipolar spoof localized surface plasmon resonances in a hybrid structure consisting of a corrugated metallic disk coupled with a C-shaped dipole resonator. The uncoupled corrugated metallic disk only supports a dipolar resonance in the transmission spectrum due to perfect symmetry of the structure. However, the dark multipolar spoof localized surface plasmon resonances emerge when coupled with a bright C-shaped resonator which is placed in the vicinity of the corrugated metallic disk. These excited multipolar resonances show minimum influence on the coupling distance between the C-shaped resonator and corrugated metallic disk. The resonance frequencies of the radiative modes are controlled by varying the angle of the C-shaped resonator and the inner disk radius, both of which play dominant roles in the excitation of the spoof localized surface plasmons. Observation of such a transition from the dark to radiative nature of multipolar spoof localized plasmon resonances would find potential applications in terahertz based resonant plasmonic and metamaterial devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据