4.7 Article

Species, Abundance and Function of Ammonia-oxidizing Archaea in Inland Waters across China

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 5, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/srep15969

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41322012, 21277156]
  2. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB15020303]
  3. Special Fund of State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control [14L01ESPC]
  4. Open Research Fund of Key Laboratory of Drinking Water Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences [15Z007KLDWST]
  5. Humboldt Research Fellowship [1152633]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ammonia oxidation is the first step in nitrification and was thought to be performed solely by specialized bacteria. The discovery of ammonia-oxidizing archaea (AOA) changed this view. We examined the large scale and spatio-temporal occurrence, abundance and role of AOA throughout Chinese inland waters (n = 28). Molecular survey showed that AOA was ubiquitous in inland waters. The existence of AOA in extreme acidic, alkaline, hot, cold, eutrophic and oligotrophic environments expanded the tolerance limits of AOA, especially their known temperature tolerance to -25 degrees C, and substrate load to 42.04 mM. There were spatio-temporal divergences of AOA community structure in inland waters, and the diversity of AOA in inland water ecosystems was high with 34 observed species-level operational taxonomic units (OTUs; based on a 15% cutoff) distributed widely in group I.1b, I.1a, and I.1a-associated. The abundance of AOA was quite high (8.5 x 10(4) to 8.5 x 10(9) copies g(-1)), and AOA outnumbered ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB) in the inland waters where little human activities were involved. On the whole AOB predominate the ammonia oxidation rate over AOA in inland water ecosystems, and AOA play an indispensable role in global nitrogen cycle considering that AOA occupy a broader habitat range than AOB, especially in extreme environments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据