4.4 Review

Recent developments regarding periostin in bronchial asthma

期刊

ALLERGOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
卷 64, 期 -, 页码 S3-S10

出版社

JAPANESE SOCIETY ALLERGOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.alit.2015.04.012

关键词

Biomarker; Bronchial asthma; Companion diagnostic; Periostin; Stratified medicine

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  2. Adaptable and Seamless Technology Transfer Program Through Target-Driven RD, JST [AS2414004P]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15K15372, 25293224] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although it is currently recognized that bronchial asthma is not a single disease but a syndrome, we have not yet made use of our new understanding of this heterogeneity as we treat asthma patients. To increase the efficacy of anti-asthma drugs and to decrease costs, it is important to stratify asthma patients into subgroups and to develop therapeutic strategies for each subgroup. Periostin has recently emerged as a biomarker for bronchial asthma, unique in that it is useful not in diagnosis but in categorizing asthma patients. We first found that periostin is a novel component of subepithelial fibrosis in bronchial asthma downstream of IL-13 signals. Thereafter, it was shown that periostin can be a surrogate biomarker of type 2 immune responses, the basis of the notion that a detection system of serum periostin is potentially a companion diagnostic for type 2 antagonists. Furthermore, we have recently shown that serum periostin can predict resistance or hyporesponsiveness to inhaled corticosteroids, based on its contribution to tissue remodeling or fibrosis in bronchial asthma. Thus, serum periostin has two characteristics as a biomarker for bronchial asthma: it is both a surrogate biomarker of type 2 immune responses and a biomarker reflecting tissue remodeling or fibrosis. We can take advantage of these characteristics to develop stratified medicine in bronchial asthma. Copyright (C) 2015, Japanese Society of Allergology. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据