4.7 Article

HIF-1-mediated metabolic reprogramming reduces ROS levels and facilitates the metastatic colonization of cancers in lungs

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 4, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/srep03793

关键词

-

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS), Japan [LS071]
  2. National Institute of Biomedical Innovation (NIBIO), Japan [09-25]
  3. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Japan [25861088, 24791293, 24659563]
  4. Sagawa Foundation for the Promotion of Cancer Research
  5. Kobayashi Foundation for Cancer Research
  6. Takeda Science Foundation
  7. Mochida Memorial Foundation for Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
  8. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24791293, 25861088, 24659563] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1) has been associated with distant tumor metastasis; however, its function in multiple metastatic processes has not yet been fully elucidated. In the present study, we demonstrated that cancer cells transiently upregulated HIF-1 activity during their metastatic colonization after extravasation in the lungs in hypoxia-independent and reactive oxygen species (ROS)-dependent manners. Transient activation induced the expression of lactate dehydrogenase A and phosphorylation of the E1 alpha subunit of pyruvate dehydrogenase, which indicated the reprogramming of glucose metabolic pathways from mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation to anaerobic glycolysis and lactic acid fermentation. The administration of the HIF-1 inhibitor, YC-1, inhibited this reprogramming, increased intratumoral ROS levels, and eventually suppressed the formation of metastatic lung tumors. These results indicate that HIF-1-mediated metabolic reprogramming is responsible for the survival of metastatic cancers during their colonization in lungs by reducing cytotoxic ROS levels; therefore, its blockade by HIF-1-inhibitors is a rational strategy to prevent tumor metastasis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据