4.7 Article

Spectral Demultiplexing in Holographic and Fluorescent On-chip Microscopy

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 4, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/srep03760

关键词

-

资金

  1. Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE)
  2. Army Research Office (ARO) Life Sciences Division
  3. ARO Young Investigator Award
  4. National Science Foundation (NSF) CAREER Award
  5. NSF CBET Biophotonics Program
  6. NSF EFRI Award
  7. Office of Naval Research (ONR) Young Investigator Award
  8. National Institutes of Health (NIH) Director's New Innovator Award from the Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health [DP2OD006427]
  9. Directorate For Engineering [0954482] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  10. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [0954482] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lensfree on-chip imaging and sensing platforms provide compact and cost-effective designs for various telemedicine and lab-on-a-chip applications. In this work, we demonstrate computational solutions for some of the challenges associated with (i) the use of broadband, partially-coherent illumination sources for on-chip holographic imaging, and (ii) multicolor detection for lensfree fluorescent on-chip microscopy. Specifically, we introduce spectral demultiplexing approaches that aim to digitally narrow the spectral content of broadband illumination sources (such as wide-band light emitting diodes or even sunlight) to improve spatial resolution in holographic on-chip microscopy. We also demonstrate the application of such spectral demultiplexing approaches for wide-field imaging of multicolor fluorescent objects on a chip. These computational approaches can be used to replace e.g., thin-film interference filters, gratings or other optical components used for spectral multiplexing/demultiplexing, which can form a desirable solution for cost-effective and compact wide-field microscopy and sensing needs on a chip.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据