4.5 Article

Strawberry-like Core-Shell Ag@Polydopamine@BaTiO3 Hybrid Nanoparticles for High-k Polymer Nanocomposites with High Energy Density and Low Dielectric Loss

期刊

ADVANCED MATERIALS INTERFACES
卷 2, 期 17, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/admi.201500361

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51522703, 51477096, 51277117]
  2. Special Fund of the National Priority Basic Research of China [2014CB239503]
  3. SMC Excellent Young Faculty Award of Shanghai Jiao Tong University
  4. Shanghai Pujiang Program [PJ14D018]
  5. State Key Laboratory of Power System in Tsinghua University [SKLD15KZ03]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Flexible nanocomposites comprising of polymer and high-dielectric-constant (high-k) ceramic nanoparticles are becoming increasingly attractive for dielectric and energy storage applications in modern electronic and electric industry. However, a huge challenge still remains. Namely, the increase of dielectric constant usually at the cost of significant decrease of breakdown strength of the nanocomposites because of the electric field distortion and concentration induced by the high-k filler. To address this long-standing problem, by using nano-Ag decorated core-shell polydopamine (PDA) coated BaTiO3 (BT) hybrid nanoparticles, a new strategy is developed to prepare high-k polymer nanocomposites with high breakdown strength. The straw-berry-like BT-PDA-Ag based ferroelectric polymer [i.e., poly(vinylideneflyoride-co-hexafluroro propylene), P(VDF-HFP)] nanocomposites exhibit greatly enhanced energy density and significantly suppressed dielectric loss as well as leakage current density in comparison with the nanocomposites with the core-shell structured BT-PDA. Coulomb-blockade effect of super-small nano-Ag is used to explain the observed performance enhancement of the nanocomposites. The simplicity and scalability of the described approach provide a promising route to polymer nanocomposites for dielectric and energy storage applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据