3.8 Article

Luminescence resonance energy transfer based on β-NaYF4:Yb,Er nanoparticles and TRITC dye

期刊

SCIENCE IN CHINA SERIES B-CHEMISTRY
卷 52, 期 10, 页码 1590-1595

出版社

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s11426-009-0243-4

关键词

upconversion emission; beta-NaYF4-Yb,Er; nanoparticles; TRITC; assembly; luminescence resonance energy transfer (LRET)

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20821091, 20671005]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China & Research Grants Council [20731160001]
  3. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2006CB601104]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

beta-NaYF4:Yb,Er nanoparticles (NPs) are one of the most efficient upconversion materials, which can convert near-infrared light to higher-energy light through multiple photon absorptions or energy transfer. In addition, they may be attractive alternative donors for luminescence resonance energy transfer (LRET) studies, because of their sharp absorption and emission profiles, high quantum yields, large anti-stokes shifts, long lifetime, low toxicity, and superior photo-stability. In principle, many problems of fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET), such as excitation of acceptors, emission overlaps between donors and acceptors, high background noise, potential toxicity, and instability, can be overcome using beta-NaYF4:Yb,Er NPs as energy donors. Because the organic coating induced separation can significantly reduce the energy transfer efficiency and aqueous FRET system is difficult to be applied in devices, we demonstrate a novel NP-dye LRET system in solid state. The emission of the beta-NaYF4:Yb,Er NPs at 539 nm overlaps with the absorption of the tetrametrylrhodarnine isothiocyante (TRITC), satisfying the requirement of LRET process. Since TRITC molecules are adsorbed on the beta-NaYF4:Yb,Er NPs by an electrostatic interaction, the interaction distance is suitable for LRET without any further modulation. The resultant solid LRET system is ready for the further applications for devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据