4.6 Article

A co-precipitated Mg-Ti nano-composite with high capacity and rapid hydrogen absorption kinetics at room temperature

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 4, 期 81, 页码 42764-42771

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4ra05382f

关键词

-

资金

  1. Science and Technology Committee of Shanghai [14JC1491600]
  2. 'Pujiang' project [11PJ1406000]
  3. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20100073120007]
  4. Shanghai education commission [12ZZ017]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A Mg-Ti nano-composite has been co-precipitated from a tetrahydrofuran (THF) solution containing anhydrous magnesium chloride (MgCl2), titanium tetrachloride (TiCl4) and lithium naphthalide (LiNp) as the reducing agent. X-ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM), and pressure-composition-temperature (PCT) techniques are used to characterize phase components, microstructure and hydrogen sorption properties of the composite. The co-precipitated Mg-Ti nano-composite contains nearly 1.0 wt% of Ti distributed homogeneously on the surface or inside Mg particles having an average particle size of about 50 nm. Orthorhombic gamma-MgH2 phases and tetragonal gamma-TiH2 phases are obtained when the Mg-Ti nano-composite is hydrogenated at 75 degrees C. PCT measurements reveal the superior hydrogen absorption property of the Mg-Ti nano-composite: its maximum hydrogen capacity can reach up to 6.2 wt% within 2 h at room temperature under a hydrogen pressure of 3 MPa. The activation energy for hydrogen absorption is determined to be 50.2 kJ mol(-1) H-2. The hydrogenation and dehydrogenation enthalpies of the nano-composite are calculated to be -73.0 +/- 1.8 and 75.8 +/- 4.7 kJ mol(-1) H-2, close to the standard values for Mg (-74.1 +/- 2.9 kJ mol(-1) H-2). The catalytic effects from the co-precipitated Ti and the tetragonal gamma-TiH2 formed during the hydrogenation process lead to extremely fast absorption kinetics at room temperature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据