4.6 Article

Examining the Performance of Refractory Conductive Ceramics as Plasmonic Materials: A Theoretical Approach

期刊

ACS PHOTONICS
卷 3, 期 1, 页码 43-50

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsphotonics.5b00409

关键词

plasmonic; refractory nitrites & carbides; DFT; electronic structure; dielectric function

资金

  1. Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology (CREST) program from the Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST)
  2. JSPS KAKENHI [15K17447]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The main aim of this study is to scrutinize promising plasmonic materials by understanding their electronic structure and correlating them to the optical properties of selected refractory materials. For this purpose, the electronic and optical properties of the conductive ceramics TiC, ZrC, HfC, TaC, WC, TiN, ZrN, HfN, TaN, and WN are studied systematically by means of first-principles density functional theory. A full ab initio procedure to calculate plasma frequency from the electronic band structure is discussed. The dielectric functions are calculated by including electronic interband and intraband transitions. Our calculations confirm that transition metal nitrides, such as TiN, ZrN, and HfN, are the strongest candidates, exhibiting performance comparable to that of conventional noble metals in the visible to the near-infrared regions. On the other hand, carbides are not suitable for plasmonic applications because they show very large losses in the same regions. From our calculated dielectric functions, the scattering and absorption efficiencies of nanoparticles made of these refractory materials are evaluated. It is revealed that TiN and TaC are the best candidate materials for applications in photothermal energy conversion over a broad spectral region. Furthermore, quality factors for localized surface plasmon resonance and surface plasmon polaritons are calculated to compare quantitative performances, and ZrN and HfN are found to be comparable to conventional plasmonic metals such as silver and gold.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据