4.6 Article

Structural prediction, analysis and decomposition mechanism of solid M(NH2BH3)n (M = Mg, Ca and Al)

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 4, 期 28, 页码 14624-14632

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4ra00772g

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC 21071019]
  2. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-09-0051]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multivalent Metal amidoboranes (MABs) are considered to be the important candidates for hydrogen storage materials. Whereas CaAB crystal structure has been determined experimentally, the crystal structures of MgAB and AlAB have not been obtained, thus hindering the further development of MABs. In this work, we determine the crystal and electronic structures of MABs (M = Mg, Ca, Al), and obtain their phononic density of states and thermodynamic properties. By means of M-N population analysis, we conclude that Al-N and Ca-N bonds have a covalent character whereas the Mg-N bond is ionic. We furthermore observe that HOMO-LUMO gaps and thus stability follow the trend MgAB approximate to AlAB > CaAB. Thermodynamic properties and their dependence on temperature seem to be very similar for AlAB and MgAB compounds compared to CaAB. CaAB has the lowest enthalpy and thus the lowest internal energy in the series of MABs (M = Mg, Ca, Al). We also propose the most probable dehydrogenation pathways during which 4n H-2 molecules are released (in 4 steps) from MgAB and CaAB and 6n H-2 (in 6 steps) from AlAB indicating that dehydrogenation from the same AB group twice in a row is less likely to occur. Furthermore, we reveal that the energy barriers for the 1st dehydrogenation step follow the trend CaAB > MgAB > AlAB. This is in agreement with the experiments showing that AlAB will start to dehydrogenate at the lowest temperature followed by MgAB. Finally, we propose that complete dehydrogenation rates at 400 degrees C follow the trend MgAB (1.73 x 10(-14) min(-1)) approximate to CaAB (1.72 x 10(-14) min(-1)) > AlAB (2.18 x 10(-16) min(-1)).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据