4.5 Article

How pregnant women learn about foetal movements: Sources and preferences for information

期刊

WOMEN AND BIRTH
卷 28, 期 1, 页码 54-59

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2014.10.002

关键词

Antenatal care; Antenatal education; Maternal knowledge; Foetal movement; Stillbirth

资金

  1. Mater Golden Casket Scholarship for the Mothers & Babies Theme, Mater Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Unexplained late gestation stillbirth is a significant health issue. Antenatal information about foetal movements has been demonstrated to reduce the stillbirth rate in women with decreased foetal movements. Midwives are ideally placed to provide this information to women. Aim: To investigate pregnant women's perceptions of information about foetal movements and preferences for receiving information. Methods: This prospective, descriptive study was conducted in the antenatal clinic of a large metropolitan maternity hospital. Findings: Pregnant women (n = 526) at 34 weeks gestation or later were recruited. Only 67% of women reported receiving information about foetal movements. Women reported that midwives (80%), family (57%), friends (48%) and own mother (48%) provided this information. Midwives were the most preferred source of information. Around half (52%) of the women used the internet for information but only 11% nominated the web as their preferred information source. Conclusion: Women prefer to be given as much information about foetal movements as possible. Women favour information from health professionals, mainly from a midwife. Midwives are well-placed to partner with pregnant women and give them unbiased and evidenced based information enabling them to make decisions and choices regarding their health and well-being. While the internet is a prevalent information source, women want to be reassured that it is trustworthy and want direction to reliable pregnancy related websites. (C) 2014 Australian College of Midwives. Published by Elsevier Australia (a division of Reed International Books Australia Pty Ltd). All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据