4.6 Article

Spatially confined electric field effect for improved resistive switching behavior of a Ni/Ta-embedded TaOx/NiSi device

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 4, 期 105, 页码 61064-61067

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4ra10446c

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea - Korean government through the NRF of MEST, Republic of Korea [NRF-2014M3A7B4049367, NRF-2014049368]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, Ni/TaOx/NiSi and Ni/TaOx/Ta/TaOx/NiSi devices were fabricated, and the resistive switching (RS) behaviors were investigated. A 2 nm-thick Ta metal layer was deposited between two TaOx films to form a Ni/TaOx/T/TaOx/NiSi stack, which was analyzed using TEM. Based on a linear scale I-V curve and an R-V graph, both devices showed conventional bipolar conductive bridge random access memory (CBRAM) characteristics with formation/rupture of Ni conductive filaments (CFs). The Ta-embedded device showed lower forming/SET voltages and initial resistance due to the reduced effective thickness of TaOx films due to the inserted Ta metal layer. In addition, the Ta-embedded device exhibited improved endurance and resistance distribution due to suppression of the random formation of Ni CFs. In this study, Ni/TaOx/NiSi and Ni/TaOx/T/TaOx/NiSi devices were fabricated, and the resistive switching (RS) behaviors were investigated. A 2 nm-thick Ta metal layer was deposited between two TaOx films to form a Ni/TaOx/T/TaOx/NiSi stack, which was analyzed using TEM. Based on a linear scale I-V curve and an R-V graph, both devices showed conventional bipolar conductive bridge random access memory (CBRAM) characteristics with formation/rupture of Ni conductive filaments (CFs). The Ta-embedded device showed lower forming/SET voltages and initial resistance due to the reduced effective thickness of TaOx films due to the inserted Ta metal layer. In addition, the Ta-embedded device exhibited improved endurance and resistance distribution due to suppression of the random formation of Ni CFs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据