4.6 Article

Comparative study on the thermal stability, flame retardancy and smoke suppression properties of polystyrene composites containing molybdenum disulfide and graphene

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 3, 期 47, 页码 25030-25040

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3ra43297a

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21071138]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2012CB922002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As a graphene-like layered nano-material, molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) has gained intensive attention from the materials fields. In our research, MoS2 and graphene sheets (GNS) were used as nanofillers to prepare polystyrene (PS) composites by masterbatch-melt blending. The morphology, thermal stability, fire resistance and smoke suppression properties of the PS composites were studied. The aim of our present study is to compare the effect of MoS2 and GNS on the thermal stability, fire resistance and smoke suppression properties of the PS composites. The cone test results indicate the PS/GNS composites exhibited superior flame retardance over PS/MoS2 composites. The results from TGA exhibits that the addition of MoS2 improved the thermal stability and char residues of the PS composites more obviously, When adding 3 wt% MoS2, T-5%, T-10% and T-50% of the composites are increased to 371, 390 and 428 degrees C, which are 39, 43 and 31 degrees C higher than those of PS/3% GNS composites. TG-IR results show that the main decomposition products of PS/MoS2 and PS/GNS composites are aromatic compounds and alkenyl units which are similar to those of pure PS. However, less flammable gas products are released relative to pure PS which further leads to the inhibition of smoke. The improvements in the thermal stability, fire resistance and smoke suppression properties of the PS composites are attributed to good dispersion, physical barrier effects of layered nanofillers and the presence of MoS2 which can promote char formation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据